We also dropped some proposed GridCoverage DataAccess interfaces into 
your module (so our friend simboss can
provide feedback). So if you wonder what these things are - please don't 
delete them :-) The other interesting proposal
in there is how to provide "connection status" information on Service 
and GeoResource handles (rather then
just a Throwable).

Jody

> Hi,
>
> Jody an I went over the DataService Source, etc... interfaces today and 
> renamed DataService to DataAccess on you.  The reason is because we 
> already have a class called Service and having Service and DataService 
> do two different things would be far too confusing.
>
> Jesse
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to