Andrea Aime wrote: >> - part of the feature identifier >> <Feature fid="people.fred.432456">..</Feature><Feature >> fid="people.wilma.432455">...</Feature> > The result of which is a GML document where the revision is either: > Oh, it occurred to me that having a changing fid for features > simply breaks the notion of an identifier and makes it hard > for client apps to work against them (especially those unaware > of versioning). So that is a point in favour of the revision attribute then... > Think of a client app that uses a fid filter to retrive > "people.fred.432456" and gets "people.fred.432457" instead > because someone else modified the feature in the meantime. > May that break the client? I would say yes, it just a matter of > how fids are used. fair nuff, Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
