Andrea Aime wrote:
>> GetLog
>> - making it available as a normal feature is fine, collections
>> support can be done if you need it.
> Indeed, it's true... I just don't have any idea of how complex that
> would be and which GML producer we would need to use...
Same one as for GetFeatures ....
<FeatureCollection>
<!--Log of revision 43235 onward-->
<Feature fid="people.fred" version="43235">..<Feature>
<Feature fid="people.fred" version="43242">..<Feature>
</FeatureCollection>
To be evil you can save space using xml references (so each feature does
not need to duplicate the same unchanged geometry).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
