I will try out 1.1.3 with 2.22.x maybe the situation is better now or maybe we can figure out the issue. I wasn't concerned before I didn't know we were switching to the new version.
Jesse On 29-Nov-06, at 7:57 PM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Cory Horner a écrit : >> Ah, so someone using 1.1.3 has managed to get the tests to pass? A >> couple months ago I upgraded to 1.1.3, watched the uDig reprojection >> code die, and quickly reverted (it seemed that some important classes >> had been removed). So 1.1.3 actually works :)? (I kept getting >> the no >> "mediaLib accelerator wrapper classes" exceptions, just like the >> guy on >> geotools-users with the "Another JAI question" post). > > > I was not aware that some test failed with JAI 1.1.3... I used > 1.1.2 and > switched to 1.1.3 just a few weeks ago. It work for Geotools 2.3 > and 2.4 (trunk) > on my machine with no change in the code. I didn't tested Geotools > 2.2. > > Martin > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php? > page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
