Quick question: Is FeatureCollection (et. al.) an attempt to implement OGC Topic 10 by the same name, or is it basically a naming coincidence?
I'm having difficulties seeing parallels, but Topic 10 is pretty sparse. ---- Oh, I finally got around to reading 19110 (Feature Catalogs). Man am I irritated at myself for not doing that sooner. In our parlance, it specifies how to describe features with a class structure (e.g. represent a schema). The good news is that it directly "realizes" 19109, so the feature model should be in good shape. I think we just need to add a top-level object called FeatureCatalog which has some housekeeping data and a Collection<FeatureType>. We should be able to add Martin's @UML tags to map specific classes and attributes directly to something specified in 19110. Bryce ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
