In talking with Rob a couple of interesting points came up ... the 
useful one is this.

Adding an implementation of Feature that implements getVersion() is 
exactly the kind of change 2.4 is trying to support. If we can reuse 
Andrea's work as an acceptance test it will be of benefit.  This kind of 
thing (extending the content GeoTools can work with) is exactly the kind 
of change that should not cause a ripple to the library, and instead we 
are left with a workaround.

If I can ask everyone to tread carefully around these issues; we have a 
couple interested parties in the GeoTools mix - and this is the period 
of pain where compromise, patience and hard work are required :-D

Cheers,
Jody

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to