Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
>> I've found various issues in IsEqualsToImpl as
>> found in 2.3.x. The original implementation is attached,
>> as well as a new implementation that should handle properly
>> most numeric cases.
>> The original implementation had various issues due to
>> numeric overflows and decimal part truncations, and could
>> not compare properly 5 and 5.0, for example.
>>
>> I've tried to build a better one, that I've attached
>> along with the current one.
>> Since this is a very central part of geotools I'd like
>> to have a review or two before committing.
> 
> I submit there an other proposal. The previous one had issues with the 
> usual corner cases (-0.0 vs +0.0 which are not equals according 
> Number.equals(Object), 

Didn't know that

> NaN values...). 

Forgot those indeed.

> This proposal also try to avoid 
> some redundancies (e.g. looking twice the same object in the same 
> hashset) and try to work with arbitrary Number as long as they are 
> representable as long or double primitive type (so we do not cover 
> BigInteger / BigDecimal case, but at least we get ride of list of 
> special cases like SUPPORTED_NUMERIC hashset).
> 
> In this proposal, the 'promote' method disaspear and 'parseToNumber' is 
> made private. I don't know when those method were introduced, so I don't 
> know if we are allowed to hide them.

I added promote, as for making it private, no problem.
I like your implementation, will merge it into 2.3.x.
Thank you for taking the time and improve the proposal :-)

Cheers
Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to