Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Thanks Andrea that is a great idea, if you check in the proposed 
> DataAccess API their was the suggestion to close() a few more things at 
> the FeatureSource or DataStore level.

I also added the same check to QueryData, same line of thought as 
Transaction, but works for read only access too (aka, forgot to
close a FeatureReader or a JDBCFeatureCollection iterator).
As for having close methods on other objects, I agree, but maybe
we don't want too many of them?
FeatureSource does not seems to need one the way it's implemented
in our current data stores, whilst I see the need at the datastore
level in fact (get rid of connection pools for example).

Cheers
Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to