Andrea Aime wrote: > > Hum, FeatureType does not seem to be boiled down effectively, the > FeatureType of a FeatureCollection simply does not make sense to me? > I think I would expect getFeatureType returned the feature type of > features contained in the collection, but that's not what happens > (because the current implementation says FeatureCollection IsA Feature, > something I don't believe it's right despite what OGC may say). >
Just a quick note. We may not wish to model like the OGC and GML, but we are stuck with mapping to them at the end of the day. Having this be a set instead of a single type would be nice. The method naming is confusing i admit. The new feature model uses associations to provide access to the types of features in the collections. I imagine this is more correct from a modeling point of view, but I will leave that debate to the experts. -Justin > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > > !DSPAM:1004,459a2a2877047785049143! > -- Justin Deoliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Open Planning Project http://topp.openplans.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
