I suspect that the C++ and Java crowds have attacked the same problem from completely different angles, and are not at a point where it would be difficult to bring them together. I just wanted to make sure that the two projects are aware of each other and have identified what is/is not common.
Jason Birch wrote: > Cameron Shorter wrote: > >> Would it be appropriate or desirable for FDO to align with GeoAPI? >> > > Hi Cameron, > > To me it looks like both GeoTools and GeoAPI are more than data access > layers, somewhere between FDO and the MapGuide Web API > <http://mapguide.osgeo.org/files/mapguide/docs/webapi/index.html> in my > familiarity-space. > > What did you have in mind by "align with'? Identical data models? Identical > objects / methods / method signatures? Given the level of third party > development and the amount of internal work that kind of change would > require, I don't think that I would support that kind of drastic change. > > Of course, my only role in the FDO project is as a user. :) > > Jason > > -- Cameron Shorter Systems Architect, http://lisasoft.com.au Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5011 Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
