Bryce L Nordgren ha scritto: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/14/2007 01:38:48 > AM:
> Nope. Use the default (slow) generic service. I suspect that Geometry > implementations will only offer services if there is a specific and > substantial performance advantage over the generic services. Using this > scheme, ALL geometry implementations leverage decimation if a generic > decimation service is written. If it provides its own, the process is just > faster or smaller, that's all. Oh hum, this would work, but then we need a way for Geometry packages to advertise their capabilities. The default implementation, using only GeoAPI interfaces, could then ask "do you support xxx?" and leverage it instead of going thru the slower but general path. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
