Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> Sounds great! Question is there any chance of combining the xml >> plugins? Ie GML2 and Filter 1.0 kind of work togther, same deal for GML3 >> and Filter 1.1... perhaps we could reduce the number of plugins by >> grouping compatible plugins together? >> > I am not sure others will agree. And it strikes me as odd to start > grouping, this is what module dependencies are for. > > And I stress again, these are not plugins. Okay then my head was not on straight ... my impression is that these are bindings and the bindings are made available to the engine via a plugin system? Oh wait - they are provided as part of a configuration step ... Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
