Chris Holmes wrote: > Well thank you! (I wrote it, and was told that it was no longer good > enough) I second that Chris - good job (especially on the documentation). > The justification I got was that the superlongnamedvisitor had more > potential for extensibility, that in theory it'd be able to handle > filters better. Which I concede, as sqlencoder isn't designed for > filters, but as of yet there's not much filter stuff in the visitor > thing. > > I was fine to have it deprecated since it doesn't make sense to have > two things that do basically the exact same thing. I never got a > clear explanation as to why it was written in the first place, I know > it was for the WFSDatastore. But it's used in PostGIS now, which is > when I got the above explanation. From a design standpoint they both looked very similar to me. Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
