Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: >>> xml compatibility pack 1: >>> - filter1_0, sld1_0, gml2 >>> >>> xml compatibility pack 2: >>> - filter1_1, sld1_1, gml3 >>> >>> Would you consider that kind of thing sane? >> Apple and oranges? What xml parsers have to do with geometry >> wkt parsers? Oh,you're missing sld too, we have two of them (parsers). > Ha ha you got me :-) Okay I corrected the example above. > > The point was that we could both have a fewer number of jars to manage > by combining bindings > for specifications together into a couple of modules.
Can we try another path? The issue with having many jars is that without maven it's hard to deal with them... unless we provide users with a list of dependencies: mvn project-info-reports:dependencies This generates a page with a hierarchical view of what depends on what, as well as a flat list of the jars, with versions and all. We need to generate the mvn site along with releases in order to have it for each module. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
