So the following proposal is going ahead: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Provide+common+parsers+in+a+consistent+fashion
It is just about package renaming at this time, CQL will remain a separate module - and move to supported status (provided the PMC votes now). Cheers, Jody Here is the section from todays meeting: > <jgarnett> so for now lets keep CQL out of the mix > <jgarnett> I can always depend on it for my examples; ... > <aaime> Just to be clear > <aaime> I _love_ CQL > <jgarnett> so should it move to supported status > <jgarnett> and Mauricio become a module maintainer (as was > requested in december?) > <aaime> absolutely, it should move to supported status > <jgarnett> okay then let me make that motion: > <jgarnett> I move that CQL module move to library/cql and > Mauricio be dragging along with it as module maintainer > <jgarnett> he has shown a good understanding of eveyrthing > geotools; has read the developers guide > <jgarnett> and play's nice with others > <aaime> +1 for me > <jgarnett> +1 > <jgarnett> cholmes ping! > <jgarnett> simboss ping! > <jgarnett> rgould ping > <simboss> +1 :-) > <simboss> (distracted byt gsoc :-) ) > |<-- cholmes has left freenode (Read error: 110 (Connection > timed out)) > <jgarnett> darn that is an anti ping for cholmes > <aaime> It's a time out ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
