On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 17:17 -0700, Cory Horner wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> Here is this month's release:
> 
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.4-M1
> 
> Everything is there, but the unsupported directory was cut from the 
> javadocs due to errors.

Hey,

Thanks for doing the work. However, I have questions about this approach
going forward. 

(1) Why drop all of unsupported? Will it not be possible to isolate
those parts of unsupported that don't compile or have internal changes
broken everything?

(2) why release an alpha milestone to users? I can see the need for core
developers to test their build for the new release but I don't see the
reason to expose this to users. I really don't want to handle the slew
of messages: "where's my mappane?" so I would suggest *not* mentioning
these on the user list until we get to the lockdown for release (e.g.
release candidates). 

--adrian

Yes, I know I'm too late/slow. Such it goes. ;-)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to