Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > Farber, Saul (ENV) a écrit : >> Martin, what do you think of these changes? Do you think they can be >> applied as is to trunk and 2.3.x? Or are there other issues that you think >> need to be addressed? > > I'm all for those changes if they are helpful to Geoservers. I have not > applied > them yet only because I'm not yet up to date with other tasks on the stack. > Would you like to applies them to SVN (both trunk and 2.3 branch) if you have > SVN access please?
+1 for me, but please delay the change against 2.3.x since we're about to release Geoserver 1.5.0. Geoserver 1.5.1 and Geoserver 1.6.0 will greatly benefit from this change thought, many thanks for pursuing this (Andrea starts to feel again the log4j nirvana :-)) Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
