Martin Desruisseaux wrote: >> I would think it better to adjust our property file format to include a >> initial header containing the authority definition. But these are >> details ... are they interesting details to you at this time? >> > Maybe in the future if there is a need for that. For now there is other tasks > to > finish first. So what do we do with CRS_AUTHORITY_EXTRA_FILE? Can we ommit > this > hint for now, improve the javadoc for CRS_AUTHORITY_EXTRA_DIRECTORY (so we > talk > about the authority.properties convention), and maybe revisit > CRS_AUTHORITY_EXTRA_FILE later if there is a need and less rush? > This is kind of a silly situtation; more 99% of uses users simply want to add more "EPSG" codes ... sure remove the Key. The reason I was resisting was an earlier wish to have: - epsg.properties - the official ones - extra.properties - the extra ones in common use - custom.properties - additional user supplied ones
I certainly can assign each of these to different paths... so lets move on. For my part I will move on to epsg-oracle (I am getting sick of geoserver planning and could use some code about now). Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
