Hi Tyler is there a license we could use that would make this easy for you? We are open to your suggestion here.
Jody > Yes it is something you need to respond to, as long as you are going > to continue to provide Developer Announcements to the Journal by > referring us to content you have online on that site. While the > GeoTools website has one license, we are re-publishing your content > under another one (CC-by-nd). > > I am asking that your PMC (as copyright holder) consider granting us > permission to re-license it for publication in the Journal and for > future translation. If it's a problem, then we can probably live with > it - but it is no going to be easy for us to deal with parts of the > journal under a different license - then we can't put the entire > Journal under a single license. > > This is obviously more of a concern for longer journal articles that > share more intellectual property, than it is for project updates, but > it would be good if we could relicense your updates as well. > > Make sense? > Tyler > > > > On 28-May-07, at 9:46 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > >> Hi Tyler: >> >> Is this something I need to respond to? Currently GeoTools >> documentation is under the following license: >> - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/1.3+Documentation+License >> >> Subject to the same "let's sort it out" issues as our code base. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
