Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
>> In this case the singularity is the south pole, whose latitude is
>> determined, but longitude is not. When you have it, you should add
>> the -180,180 range to envelope longitudes (or I'm missing something)?
> 
> Longitude would be tested too, like every bounded axis (no matter which axis 
> it
> is). In the particular case of South Pole, the longitude is irrelevant, but 
> this
> is just a particular case. Generally speaking, we have a choice:
> 
> Testing  (-180, -90), (180, -90), (-180, 90), (180, 90)
> 
> or testing (-180, centerY), (180, centerY), (centerX, -90), (centerX, 90).
> 
> Where (centerX, centerY) are relative to the initially transformed envelope. I
> tend toward the later. It make no difference for polar projections, but may 
> make
> a difference for the 180° longitude bounds. Consider a MercatorProjection 
> where
> the transformed envelope is between 20°N and 40°N. If we try to project (-180,
> 90) and its friends, we will get a TransformException because Mercator
> projection is not supported at the pole. If we try to project (-180, centerY)
> instead, we will get a valid point. If this point is inside the source 
> envelope
> because this envelope overlaps the 180° longitude, the transformed envelope 
> will
> be expanded on the full (-180 to 180) width. This is quite large, but at least
> it is correct, better than actual behavior which return a completly wrong 
> target
> envelope when the source envelope overlaps the 180° longitude.

Sounds good. Let me know when you have something I can test in Geoserver :)
Cheers
Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to