Hi Martin; I did not get the table done up for you in time for the meeting. Comparing the two class diagrams (BEFORE and AFTER) is the best way to see what is expected. BEFORE: http://docs.codehaus.org/download/attachments/79550/ReferencingOrigional.png AFTER: http://docs.codehaus.org/download/attachments/79550/ReferencingWorker.png
Actually that does the job way better than a table could. Jody > Jody Garnett a écrit : > >> To start with: >> - I was going to make sure the tests (and online tests) were in place ... >> - Rename classes as outlined in proposal (for clarity) >> > > The proposal still the one at that page? > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Improve+CRSAuthority+Concurrency+Caching+and+Connection+Use > > About renaming class, we should not forget to keep around the old classes as > deprecated ones (except if not public), and delete them from trunk only after > the 2.4 branch creation (and do not delete from branch). > > Do you have a table of "old names" vs "new names" listing only the classes to > be > renamed? > > Martin > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
