Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > >> >> Are you meaning the unsupported modules aren't copied over to the >> stable branch? This is nonsense, and would create quite some troubles >> for Geoserver, since we are providing some of the unsupported modules >> as extra datastores (Oracle, MySql, anyone? Lately Oracle saw more >> fixes than WFS datastore, shall we move it to unsupported as well?). > > I did mean that but you are correct... that would make things pretty > tough on GeoServer.... So how about a compromise. > > 1. We copy over all unsupported modules to 2.4 > 2. We create blocker tasks against 2.4-RC0 to move > arcsde,db2,pg-versioned, and xml-* to supported > 3. We ensure that any unsupported modules that remain do not into the > official 2.4 release.
Agreed on 1, agreed with Rob that anything that gets into supported status in 2.4.x should do the same in trunk, as for 3, I'm fine with it, but it may be less thought on our users if we released the unsupported (but compiling) modules anyways, putting them into an unsupported category/zip/whatever. Just enough to make them stand out and make it clear that we need help from them. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
