Alrighty, sounds good... 2.3.4 it is. -justin
Adrian Custer wrote: > Why re- and not a 2.3.4? I would favour the latter. > > --adrian > > On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 09:55 -0700, Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to redo the Geotools 2.3.3 release. Some crucial fixes that >> were supposed to get into it never did. I am at fault because i only >> backported to 2.4.x and not 2.3.x.. The changes are pretty key to >> GeoServer 1.5.2 release so I think its worth redoing for us. >> >> Anyone have any objections? >> >> -Justin >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > > !DSPAM:4007,46b35fee92091096210785! > -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project http://topp.openplans.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
