+1 On 9/20/07, Ian Turton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/20/07, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Adrian, I was not really interested in a discussion of the GeoAPI > > Geometry model. The proposal for an API change is all about GeoTools and > > making sure that we can plugin the implementations of geometry we have > > available to us. > > > > The fact that I am not getting a PMC vote says that either a) the change > > procedure is not working or b) everyone is busy prepping for FOSS4G. > > > > The fact is that Graham is new to GeoTools development procedure and is > > doing his best to play by the rules; if we don't follow through on our > > end we are back to the unstable development practices of last year that > > caused everyone worry. > > > > This kind of change would of caused one email last year; as it is this > > has taken two months - the code is in the code base and released > > already, documentation exists. > > > > PMC members - I understand if you do not need ISO Geometry for your > > application, we are not looking for a discussion of merit or geotools > > integration at this time. > > Only your vote. > > > > +1 > > Ian > PS busy preping for FOSS4G >
-- ------------------------------------------------------- Eng. Simone Giannecchini President /CEO GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027 mob: +39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
