Consider moving GenericName and Record implementations in a "name" subpackage
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: GEOT-1526
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1526
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Wish
Components: core metadata
Affects Versions: 2.5-M0
Reporter: Martin Desruisseaux
Assignee: Martin Desruisseaux
Priority: Minor
The {{org.geotools.util}} package is becoming larger and larger. It may be
helpfull to dispatch some of its classes in subpackages. This proposal is about
creating a new package:
* {{org.geotools.util.name}}
and move there the following classes. We would take this opportunity for
renaming some implementation classes that currently have the same name than the
interface they implement.
* {{NameFactory}}
* {{GenericName}} (to be renamed: {{AbstractName}}? {{GenericNameImpl}}?)
* {{LocalName}} (to be renamed: {{DefaultLocalName}}? {{LocalNameImpl}}?)
* {{ScopedName}} (to be renamed: {{DefaultScopedName}}? {{ScopedNameImpl}}?)
* {{MemberNameImpl}} (or {{DefaultMemberName}}?)
* {{RecordTypeImpl}} (or {{DefaultRecordType}}?)
More implementations may be added later:
* {{Record}}
* {{NameSpace}}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
