> ok, will do. Though I guess much could break as the default execution mode of > OVERRIDE is leading to not duplicate binding execution but relies on all the > properties being set? > How much else besides xml-wfs is relying on it? > Question: these should belong to the "core xml" jira component? > Well... the geoserver xml bindings are pretty much the only bindings that depend on that class on 2.4.x. Other then that its the bindings in xml-wfs, and xml-ows on geotools trunk. I suggest we make the change only on trunk. And I am not sure if these should fall under "core-xml", as I think that refers to the previous version of the parser. I am fine with putting them there but it may get confusing. Should we break out another jira component for "xsd xml"? Not sure...
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > > !DSPAM:4007,472f3b80131332085621377! > -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project http://topp.openplans.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
