Hi On Thursday 13 December 2007, Jody Garnett wrote: > Over on the udig side things were not so pretty; basically I found > another JTS fork where the buffer operation was > reimplemented to have a progress listener (mostly so operations could be > canceled). While this is a good ability to > have, and some JTS operations can take a very long time, the cost of > maintaining our own buffered operation is > a wee bit high. Suggestions are certainly welcome.
I think, the cost to maintain the jts fork is expensive. We are not doing big change in the jts base code, but we will spend a lot of time in maintenance tasks. Thinking in progress listener, we could suggest to jts people to add some call back or listeners to allow a better control from the client modules. -- Mauricio Pazos www.axios.es tel-:+34 94 441 63 84 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
