Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > I was not criticizing since I'm doing only a cleanup of geotools svn. Since > I'm > not touching to udig SVN, I'm not in position to make anything else than a "by > the way" observation, and my observation may very well be irrelevant... > I understand, I did not take your words as criticism, it is a known problem that causes us lots of grief. I would love any suggestions on how to fix. >> I am considering setting up a seperate svn just to hold jars; so the >> udig check out can link to these things as needed. Is this a stupid >> idea? And do you have any suggestions on an approach that could be used. >> > It would make a smaller SVN to backup for the administrator, but I don't know > if > you use Maven to build uDig, and if so what are the problems that prevented > the > dependencies mechanism to work. We don't use maven, the maven people and the eclipse people do not get along well. Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
