Is it worth looking at; or should Martin stick with jaxb? Does not look like we can seperate out a metadata plugin at this time ( a factory needs to be set up).
Jody > I would not really call it a "standard". The one that does ship with > the core of the library is unmaintained, and the second generation of > it is an extension. > > Jody Garnett wrote: >> Martin just a thought; have you considered using the xml binding >> framework - is the geotools standard after all. It may not be sun but >> it is dependency every downloads. >> Jody >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Geotools-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >> >> !DSPAM:4007,47a78650157927180515871! >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
