> > hmmm.. I'm not even pmc, but as it got 3 positives and no negatives I guess > that's why it went forward... still, feel free to ask who you need to ask > about that, I was told what I've been doing with WFS client code where > duplicating that proposal work (that is, providing information the wfs > datastore were already doing and being used by uDig), and instead of > duplicating just joined. Now, in my opinion that's what trunk is for. >
I believe the proposal process allows for someone to give a negative vote, and as long as they give constructive feedback (which i did), the proposal writer should incorporate it unless there is overwhelming opposition. And this case there was none. I believe Andrea and Jody even agreed. So I guess i am really just confused. -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
