Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > I have been giving a bit of rough feedback to others for their proposals > so here is a chance for people to get back at me. I finally got around > to writing up my ideas on how to cleanup data access with regard to > feature collection. > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/DataStore+Cleanup
Time for my feedback too: * the DataStore.getFeature(blah, blah) should be merged with Gabriel proposal * FeatureSource2 ok (besides the name) * FeatureStore2 hum... don't know. Do we really need to have writers around at all? FeatureStore already has addFeature, modifyFeatures, delete. That would work fine for databases for example. On second thought, modifying a shapefile or a GML with a non streaming approach might be hard, so I guess we need to keep them around. Yet, I would avoid having getFeatureWriterUpdate, you can use getFeatureWriter for the very same purpose. For consistency sake, can we name getFeatureInsert as getFeatureAppend()? Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
