I have not incorporated any of the stuff from my proposal as I thought they were more or less seperated. I woudl rather we focus on that after we nail down what to do with getting complex features on smoothly.
Jody Garnett wrote: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> That is not needed anymore, FeatureSource has getFeatureReader in >> the proposal (maybe in Justin's one) so it's enough > Sweet; I just looked and it was not in justins spike - but I will see > that is is added. > Jody > > !DSPAM:4007,47acbf03267573668746562! > -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
