+1 from me Gabriel (on gml3 at least). I think a new category of module is needed for the modules you list below. Stuff that no one really uses or was experimental is just taking up room in our repo.
-Justin Gabriel Roldán wrote: > Hi guys, > > sending directly to you as you're the maintainers of the pending modules that > does not compile: gml3, tile and ogr. > I'd like to move them to the "archive" profile (that is, officially kick them > out of the build) so I can have a compiling workspace including the pending > modules to implement the featureaccess proposal. Or rather you may prefer to > get them building, either way is fine to me. (question: pending modules are > meant to at least build, right?) > > Cheers, > > Gabriel > > !DSPAM:4007,47b63a3f58687082231907! > -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
