On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm 0 (neutral) on the Node and Visitor classes - I don't really know how they > fit in the big picture because of my lack of knowledge of styling and > streaming > renderer. > > However I ask to remove from the proposal the new Category hierarchy. I > realize > that the existing Category class may need to be extented in order to meet > RasterSymbolizer needs, but I'm in disagreement with the TransformCategory > split > proposed there. >
What do you mean by "remove"? The code to actually do the raster symbolization heavily relies on this code it cannot be simply "removed". What do you suggest? > The proposed Category hierarchy duplicates org.geotools.coverage.Category > introducing confusion if they appear in public API (and they will since they > would be included in the javadoc). > I'm in disagreement with Simone's view about > "sampleToGeophysics". It is a packaged form of "scale", "offset" and "nodata" > attributes which anyone can found in NetCDF, HDF and other file formats and > is > even part of OGC specification. It is closely tied to Unit of Measurement, > which > is indisociable from Coverage data (this is also OGC specification). It is > conceptually related to "gridToCRS" transform, which is also indisociable > from > any Coverage. 1>as I pointed out in the other email, we are not understanding each other here, I hope that email will bring some clarity. 2>This does not entirely fits this proposal, since it is not discussing about refactoring coverage > > The "Raster symbolizer" proposal actually mixes both a raster symbolizer and > a > refactoring of Category - even if it is in a separated package. I'm against > the > later. I'm not against a refactoring of Category, but I disagree with the one > which is proposed on that page and I'm against the fact that this refactoring > would be done in a separated package. I definitely see your point, this duplication of names can be confusing. I am going to think about a way to hide the classification categories for the moment in order to bring up the discussion again in the coverge context. Simone. > > Martin > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > -- ------------------------------------------------------- Eng. Simone Giannecchini President /CEO GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027 mob: +39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
