Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>>> Dropping back to Java 5 results in different math apparently, doing 
>>> so now...
>> Hum is that 2.4.1 that you're talking about? If so, it's supposed to
>> be built with java 1.4.2, did we ever committed to make it buildable
>> with other java versions?
> Now we did not; but I am testing - and this was the first window I grabbed.
> I will report back from a sane environment shortly...but I don't have 
> Java 1.4 around.
> 
> Can I confirm you are using Maven 2.0.5?

Nope, I'm using 2.0.8 on my box, and used 2.0.7 on the machine where
I made the release. Both work fine for me, don't know where that
"use 2.0.5 or die" msg on the release guide comes from.
Cheers
Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to