Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
>> Martin, if you give me some directions on how you'd like this to be
>> handled I can do the grunt work and prepare some unit test
> 
> Logging warnings would be simplier than handling a hint. And thinking 
> about that, a longitude (for example) outside the -180/+180° range is 
> not necessary wrong, since 190° is equivalent to -170° and every 
> trigonometric functions (sin, cos, etc.) used by map projections should 
> still have correct mathematical behavior with those values. It is just 
> that there is some chance that a out-of-range value is an user error, 
> but not necessarly. And for some projection like Mercator, the threshold 
> when we consider that a value is "out-of-range" is somewhat arbitrary - 
> the case is really not as clear as the "missing bursa wolf parameters" 
> case.
> 
> For all those reasons, I'm more tempted by logging. In such case I 
> suggest to add the following members in MapProjection:
> 
> protected static final Logger LOGGER; (if not already there)
> 
> protected (or private?) boolean verifyCoordinateRanges;
> 
> maybe some convenience methods to be determined.
> 
> And replace the exceptions by a warning logged only the first time it 
> occurs for a given MapProjection instance. Because MapProjection are 
> included in ProjectedCRS instances, and because the later are usually 
> cached (when returned by CRS.decode(...)), in most case it will results 
> in only one warning per EPSG code. Do you think it could be a reasonable 
> compromise?

Sounds reasonable, but let me understand this better. Is 
verifyCoordinateRanges used as a flag to determine whether the exception
has been thrown once, so it's initialized as true, and then
then changed to false the first time we log a warning?

Cheers
Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to