As per IRC chat today Martin; I have committed a method compatible implementation of Range into your referencing module. I have not hooked it up :-) I suspect that JScience probably has a range class so if we are going to move in that direction my implementation may be a waste of time?
One method (ie substract) is not implemented; as I am not even sure if we use it. Differences from JAI: - Java 5 generics allowing: new Range<Integer>( Integer.class, 0, 0 ) - my definition of isEmpty includes (unbounded, unbounded) ie this is an invalid range and I treat it as such - additional constructor to create an "empty" range: new Range( Class ) This is a "clean room implementation" implemented without looking at JAI source; so your testing is appreciated. Cheers, Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
