Justin wrote:

A while back gt2-xml-xsd used to be the
core of the module, however it got moved to gt2-xml-core. 

Thanks, this was the missing piece for me. Now you mention it, the contents of 
the two is more or less identical.

Jody wrote:

> You will find that the xml-xsd solutions is *really* well documented

Indeed it is! I was just looking specifically for a piece of information about 
the "xml-xsd" artifact in contrast to the other xml jars, but this is solved 
now.

> I am not sure why these modules are not listed in the module matrix;
> perhaps we should drop the concept if it is not something developers
> can keep up with.

I like the concept in general, just the star rating system seems to be used  
inconsistently. Sometimes there are two stars, sometimes five with some of them 
red instead, sometimes a red cross that's not explained at all. But this is 
just a detail. It is a good overview, I get the information I need from the 
referenced project pages, and this is what matters to me.
-- 
Matthias Basler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., 
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to