I have been working on GS 1.6.x / GT 2.4.x, and have tangled with a few GML3 binding overrides required to get community-schemas to work as expected for GeoSciML Testbed 3.
At some stage, community-schemas will need to be ported to the trunks of GS and GT. I am trying to understand how much this process will be helped by the changes to the feature/attribute model introduced in trunk (by Gabriel Roldán?). (1) Are binding overrides principally necessary because of the wrapping required to support complex features in GS 1.6.x / GT 2.4.x? (2) If so, does this mean that the new feature model will remove the need for (most) binding overrides? (3) Will the GML3 bindings be regenerated for the new feature/attribute model? (I am an EMF ignoramus.) Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining Australian Resources Research Centre 26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
