Jody Garnett a écrit :
> So I got ask what is the point of removing prefixes again? are we just
> trying to make the "mvn site:site" target work? Would it be better to
> change the directory names and keep a "geotools-" prefix (like every
> other project around?).
The prefix are there, if you look at the target/binaries directory after a "mvn
install" from the root of GeoTools project.
If a user download GeoTools and use those JAR, he will have no problem.
If a user put Maven dependencies from his own project to GeoTools project,
maven
build will be fine. However:
- our custom build/maven/jar-collector plugin copies JARs in target/binaries
without their prefix, because those prefix are not in the Maven repository.
This is a limitation of our jar-collector that we can fix. I was just not
aware that we would have as much conflicts (I didn't though about the "H2"
case) if we don't do this change right now...
- I'm not sure how "maven assembly" would behave. Actually I don't know if
we are using it?
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
