Martin, Can you try it on your local copy and see if it works? Then if it all works with maven 2.0.9 and no pluginRepository sections, we can consider the question more fully...as there will be concrete benefits and costs.
--saul On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 23:40 +0200, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Andrea Aime a écrit : > > I don't have any specific issue with upgrading to 2.0.9 provided it > > works ;) (past history shows that maven is full of surprises... as Jody > > wisely said some days ago "when it works... it's magic... and when it > > does not... it's magic too! :) "). > > Yes, sometime I wonder if Maven is black or white magic... My hope is > precisely > that relying on the plugin versions selected by Maven developpers for 2.0.9 > would solve magically some issues like aggregated javadoc (I may be > dreaming... > but in the past changing pluging versions worked sometime). > > Martin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
