Hi Jody, On Wednesday 23 April 2008 08:35:04 pm Jody Garnett wrote: > Hi Gabriel, the proposal is clear and I have only minor feedback.... > - getOffset()? really .... the catalog specification uses startPosition > and maxRecords (see page 143 of 07-006r1). we're reusing the concept of maxFeatures already available in Query, and for offset I could go either way.
> Is the WFS specification > actually going with offset or have we just not asked yet. afaik Andrea asked a couple times and got no answer. We just found some preliminar wfs 1.2 schemas and they didn't contemplate the csw query parameters, but are just going to provide previous and next page "links" through URL's > -The class QueryCapabilities has not been updated in response to my > previous feedback, ie we need a no argument super class, all the options > to be false by default and there is a choice on how to handle "setting" > the values.. right, I assumed this was that class. You want it to be an interface though, and the default impl as a separate class with setters a'la DefaultQuery, right? cheers, Gabriel > . > > Cheers, > Jody > > Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > Hi PMC, hi all > > > > As some of you already know, I am taking Andrea's place on the Feature > > Paging proposal. > > > > We have been debating for a couple weeks now about it both on IRC and > > mailing list and would like to call for vote on it, at least someone has > > further concerns. Yet, I'll beg you for a quick process. > > > > The proposal page is at > > <http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Feature+paging+and+Query+capab > >ilities>. > > > > As per yesterdays geoserver IRC meeting [1] I've introduced to the > > proposal the use of org.opengis.filter.SortBy.NATURAL_ORDER as the > > minimum sorting support requirement for a FeatureSource to support > > paging, as opposed to the special property @gmlid, which may or may not > > be the feature type's "natural order". > > > > Yet, asking to sort by feature id is still a sensible use case and should > > be handled as for any other property, regardless of the feature id being > > the native natural order or not. > > > > Also changed QueryCapabilities.getSortNames():List<Name> by a query > > method: supportsSorting(SortBy[]):boolean. > > > > Regards, > > > > Gabriel > > > > [1] <http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/2008/04/22/IRC+Logs%2C+April+22> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/ja > >vaone _______________________________________________ > > Geotools-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > > !DSPAM:4045,480f815d269652090977483! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
