Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > Its look like that a new method has been added in the Function interface > (see attached diff), and GeoTools implementation do not yet implement it. > > Given that the documentation in the returns tag said "Optional", I > assume that it is okay to just implement them as "return null" in GeoTools.
Sigh, that's why I asked for a proposal for the geoapi stuff... this way you're going to break GT2 api without the proper process, which is not acceptable. For the moment, if you really need to hack GeoApi hard, can't we deploy a tagged release of geoapi and make geotools depend on that? Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
