Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > Andrea Aime a écrit : >> Sigh, that's why I asked for a proposal for the geoapi stuff... >> this way you're going to break GT2 api without the proper process, >> which is not acceptable. > > Andrea, this method has not be introduced neither by me, Cédric or > Johan. None of us touched to this Function interface. > > I'm not asking to implement that method. It was just making an > observation about how the build could be fixed in an other way than > reverting the change. The decision is not up to us since we didn't made > that change.
Apologies. Yet changing the gt2 api in response to a screwup in GeoApi is not the proper answer imho. GeoApi rollback or switching to an earlier version of GeoApi look like a more promising path (especially the first). Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
