Andrea Aime a écrit :
> Yet changing the gt2 api in response to a screwup in GeoApi is not the
> proper answer imho. GeoApi rollback or switching to an earlier version
> of GeoApi look like a more promising path (especially the first).
Thats fine for me. Maybe GeoTools doesn't need to be always compilable against
the latest GeoAPI SVN, as long as it compiles against the latest snapshot
deployed on the maven repository.
I believe that Jody wanted to avoid the duplication of a Function interface,
which is a fine goal in my opinion (if the same interface can work for both
Expression and Symbol Encoding, maybe with sub-interfaces to be introduced).
Lets the discussion go on on GeoAPI and suggest peoples to not expect a
GeoTools
alignment until the experiments seetle down. I admit that we have lacked
communication.
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
