Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Thats fine for me. Maybe GeoTools doesn't need to be always compilable > against > the latest GeoAPI SVN, as long as it compiles against the latest snapshot > deployed on the maven repository. > You are correct Martin; I was not even going to annoy the geotools list with this problem until we had sorted it out on the geoapi mailing list and deployed a snapshot etc... > I believe that Jody wanted to avoid the duplication of a Function interface, > which is a fine goal in my opinion (if the same interface can work for both > Expression and Symbol Encoding, maybe with sub-interfaces to be introduced). > Lets the discussion go on on GeoAPI and suggest peoples to not expect a > GeoTools > alignment until the experiments seetle down. I admit that we have lacked > communication. > > Martin >
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
