Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > The recent threads on the different Envelope classes got me to > thinking about the policy for Geometry representation in GeoTools, if > there is one. In OpenJUMP land representation of feature geometries is > pretty simple. You just use JTS. :] If something more is needed you > cook it up. (I don't think this happens very often.) > There we have it; the two ways in which GeoTools cannot just get by with JTS even for a simple concept like Rectangle: - we interact with non JTS libraries - we are interested in work beyond what JTS can accomplish
And the acknowledgement from all sides that JTS is useful and allows us to handle a range of topics today. Cheers, Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
