Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > Does GeoTools provide a default implementation of the SimpleFeature > interface? If not, how about an abstract class? > It does, if you grab a FeatureFactory using CommonFactoryFinder you should be okay ... > Or should I just use SimpleFeatureBuilder and not worry about the > implementation of SimpleFeature that is returned? > Correct. Here is the example: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/05+How+to+Write+a+Shapefile
It looks like I need to update this example for GeoTools-2.5-M2... > Thanks for the info. > For the general idea of using Factories etc consider the following page: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/How+to+Create+Something Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
