Wouldn't I have to rename the directory AND the artifact id so that they match? Do I need to do anything special with the folder renaming in regards to committing the changes to svn?
Graham. Adrian Custer wrote: > Yeah, > > That's martin's code keeping us honest during the build. The best thing > would be to rename the directory rather than tweaking the artifactID. > Other than that, we'll have to make an exception in the script but that > would break the default maven site generation for that directory. > > --adrian > > On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 12:56 -0700, Graham Davis wrote: > >> I've been trying to resolve this by doing what the WFS XSD module is >> doing. That pom file just renames the artifact id of the module to >> gt-xsd-wfs. But when I did this with the WPS XSD module, like this: >> >> <groupId>org.geotools.xsd</groupId> >> <artifactId>gt-xsd-wps</artifactId> >> >> I get this maven compile error: >> >> [INFO] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR >> [INFO] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> [INFO] Invalid <artifactId> "gt-xsd-wps". Expected "gt-wps" (derived >> from the directory name). >> [INFO] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch >> [INFO] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> [INFO] Total time: 4 minutes 21 seconds >> [INFO] Finished at: Wed May 21 12:40:02 PDT 2008 >> [INFO] Final Memory: 42M/89M >> [INFO] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Anyone know what I am missing or what is wrong? I've been comparing >> this to what the WFS XSD module is doing and can't see any immediate >> differences. >> >> Graham. >> >> Jody Garnett wrote: >> >>> Hi Adrian; we just ran into a conflict between unsupported/wps and >>> xsd/wps as well. We have experimented with making the eclipse project >>> name template into "gt-xsd-[artifactId]" in the xsd/pom.xml. >>> >>> Are you suggestion changing the artifact / jar / folder name all >>> together? What does mvn site:site think we should do... >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jody >>> >>> Adrian Custer wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hey both, >>>> >>>> Any chance we could rename that module? Right now it gives us "gt-core" >>>> which would confuse me if I landed on Geotools today. >>>> >>>> Could we call it "gt-xml-core", "gt-xmlnew-core" or some such? >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> --adrian >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Geotools-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Geotools-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >>> >>> >> > > -- Graham Davis Refractions Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
