I found TextualAttributeType for you to cover the xs:string case; but really the goal is to use the same information (the same data structure). So if your code is parsing in "xs:string" let us know by including that information in your AttributeType.
Jody Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > I'm working on converting Paul Austin's DataObject code to GeoTools, > so I can use it in the GPX module. (A data object is a very low-level > representation of data that SimpleFeature objects can be created > from.) > > I need to describe an attribute or property of a DataObject. I was > hoping to use the GeoAPI PropertyDescriptor and PropertyType > interfaces to do this, since that is what GeoTools FeatureModel > appears to be using currently. > > I'm just curious why the PropertyDescriptor and PropertyType > interfaces were made separate. How are they really different? Will > there be any issues if I implement both interfaces with a single class > providing information about a DataObject attribute? > > Does GeoTools provide default implementations of these two interfaces? > > Thanks for the help. > > Landon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
